First, that’s “Your uninformed opinions…”, not “You uninformed opinions…”. (For those not wishing to appear to proudly enshrine their ignorance of the English language on a public forum.)

Second, my “opinion” on the case is just as relevant as your own. I mean, that’s what an opinion is… ;)

As to facts: Did he cross state lines? Check. Did he take a rifle into an already tense situation? Check? Did he have the training, knowledge, or experience to handle and defuse the situation should the need arise? Nope. Nope. And nope.

I could go on in regard to the “facts” of the matter, but I think I’ll stop now since it’s already rather obvious where you stand on the issue. That being the case, I believe I’ll follow the advice you yourself promoted in another article, “Never Argue With Fools.”

I suggest we agree to disagree.